|
Border-Wildlife Issues Workshop
The New
Mexico Chapter of TWS is hosting a workshop to discuss wildlife issues along the
border between Mexico
and New Mexico.
The meeting will have an update of border activities and a mix of environmental
groups, Congressionals, and agencies, including a representative of
Mexico. The New Mexico Chapter plans to
develop a resolution concerning wildlife issues and send it to congressional
representatives. The NM Chapter invites AZ Chapter members to attend the
workshop. The NM Chapter is also proposing a joint resolution from all the
chapters (at least Texas,
New Mexico and
Arizona) and would welcome input from AZ members. If
any AZ TWS members can attend, please report back to the AZ TWS Board on the
workshop. We appreciate your input.
THE
NEW MEXICO CHAPTER OF THE WILDIFE SOCIETY PRESENTS:
The first annual summer workshop
Border-Wildlife Issues
Tuesday July 8, 2008
8:00 am to 5:00 pm
At the New Mexico
Farm and Ranch
Museum
Las
Cruces,
NM
For directions to the museum see: http://www.nmfarmandranchmuseum.org
The workshop will focus on:
• reviewing the issues of border
security and their impacts on wildlife
• discussing legislation
• presenting wildlife data collection
along the border
• developing recommendations for regulatory compliance, research, and
monitoring with the goal of proposing defensible alternatives and mitigation
strategies
• developing a resolution to be sent to
our elected officials
Peter David, Treasurer for the NM Chapter, is
organizing the workshop. If you plan to attend, please contact Peter David at
pdavid@swca.com
505-254-1115
Below is the draft resolution to be considered.
The Wildlife
Society – New Mexico
Chapter
Wildlife-Border Issues Workshop
July 8, 2008
Resolution on the US-Mexico Border Fence Impacts to Wildlife
WHEREAS, The Wildlife Society- New
Mexico Chapter is an organization of 200 biologists, resource managers and other
professionals in New Mexico concerned about the regional issues affecting
indigenous plants and animals in the American Southwest and who strongly support
their conservation based on sound and accurate scientific knowledge; and,
WHEREAS, we are disturbed by
potential negative environmental impacts of the Secure Fence Act of 2006
which mandates the US Department of Homeland Security to construct 3 - 4 m high
steel fences along large sections of the US-Mexico border, stretching from near
San Diego, California, to Brownsville, Texas, totaling over 1,280 km; and,
WHEREAS, Section 102(c) of the Real ID Act of 2005
exempts the Department of Homeland Security from all federal, state, and local
environmental laws when constructing fences, roads, and other barriers along US
borders, including the Endangered Species Act and National Environmental Policy
Act; and,
WHEREAS, fence construction has progressed without
substantive consideration, study or subsequent mitigation for environmental
effects; and,
WHEREAS, plans to complete the fence before 2009
have been expedited (Segee and Neeley 2006); and,
WHEREAS, the US-Mexico borderlands is a region of
high biological diversity, including many rare, threatened, and endangered
species; and,
WHEREAS, major regions along the US-Mexico border
are comprised of federal protected lands that provide essential habitat for
wildlife, including Cabeza Prieta National Wildlife Refuge, Organ Pipe Cactus
National Monument, Buenos Aires National Wildlife Refuge, Coronado National
Forest, San Pedro Riparian National Conservation Area, San Bernardino National
Wildlife Refuge, Big Bend National Park, Rio Grande Wild and Scenic River, Lower
Rio Grande Valley National Wildlife Refuge, and Santa Ana National Wildlife
Refuge in the United States, and the El Pinacate Biosphere, Santa Elena Canyon
Flora and Fauna Protection Area, and Maderas del Carmen Flora and Fauna
Protection Area in Mexico; and,
WHEREAS, construction of the fence will directly
destroy rare and endangered plants (Cohn 2007); and,
WHEREAS, the US-Mexico boundary is an arbitrary
division in relation to the natural world; and,
WHEREAS, wildlife species in the arid southwest
are dependent upon ephemeral water sources and more importantly permanent water
locations to persist in such a harsh climate, and permanent separation from
these sources by an impenetrable barrier may result in the extermination of
local populations
WHEREAS, the fence will prohibit movement and
dispersal for larger species of terrestrial wildlife, particularly federally
endangered mammals such as the jaguar, ocelot, jaguarondi, and Sonoran
pronghorn; and,
WHEREAS, many terrestrial species in the
borderlands region exist as metapopulations linked by dispersal, which depend on
movements across the international border for persistence (e.g., Hellgren et al.
2005, McCain and Childs 2008); and,
WHEREAS, for some species, such as the endangered
jaguar, scientific conclusions (McCain and Childs 2008) indicate a dependence on
large expanses of habitat and cross-border movement, and that disruption of
habitat and movement by the fence will put populations of jaguars in the United
States at great risk; and,
WHEREAS, fence construction will irreparably harm
many species and some of the Southwest’s most significant lands;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the New
Mexico Chapter of the Wildlife Society, convening in a special workshop on July
8, 2008 in Las Cruces, NM, calls upon the Governors of all the border states
(those of the U.S. and of Mexico), the U.S. Secretary of the Interior, the
Dirección General de Flora y Fauna Silvestres y Áreas Naturales
Protegidas de México, the Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and
the Secretary for Homeland Security to consider and mitigate potential negative
impacts of the border fence to wildlife and issue a moratorium on further
construction to allow for study and the recommendations of viable alternatives
to an impenetrable barrier.
We further recommend that Congress repeal
section 102(c) of the Real ID Act of 2005, and enact
the
Borderlands Conservation and Security Act (HR 2593) that will require the
Department of Homeland Security to determine the effect that a border fence will
have on wildlife and to explore alternatives to fence construction, to require
compliance with environmental laws, and fund initiatives that help reduce damage
to borderland wildlife and resources.
References
Borderlands
Conservation and Security Act. 2007. House of Representative bill 2593. June,
6 2007. http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/t2GPO/http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=110_cong_bills&docid=f:h2593ih.txt.pdf.
Accessed 6 March 2008.
Cohn, J.P.
2007. The environmental impacts of a border fence. BioScience, 57:96.
Hellgren,
E.C., D. P. Onorato, and J. R. Skiles. 2005. Dynamics of a black bear
population within a desert metapopulation. Biological Conservation,
122:131-140.
McCain, E.B., and J.L. Childs.
2008. Evidence of resident jaguars (Panthera
onca) in the southwestern United Sates and the implications for
conservation. Journal of Mammalogy, 89:1-10.
Real ID Act. 2005. Public Law
109-13. May 11, 2005, Real ID Act, 8 U.S.C. 1101. http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/toGPObss/http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=109_cong_public_laws&docid=f:publ013.109.pdf.
Accessed 6 March 2008.
Secure Fence Act. 2006. Public Law
109-367. October 26, 2006, Secure Fence Act, 8 U.S.C. 1103.
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/toGPObss/http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=109_cong_public_laws&docid=f:publ367.109.pdf.
Accessed 6 March 2008.
Segee, B.P.,
and J.L. Neely. 2006. On the line: the impacts of immigration policy on
wildlife and habitat in the Arizona
borderlands. Defenders of Wildlife,
Washington,
D.C.
|